Common Core Standards and Resources
This is the "Home" page of the "Common Core Standards and Resources" guide.
Alternate Page for Screenreader Users
Skip to Page Navigation
Skip to Page Content

Common Core Standards and Resources  

Here you'll find information about WA State's movement & integration of the Common Core, plus resources to use
Last Updated: May 3, 2013 URL: http://shs.bellinghamschools.libguides.com/content.php?pid=398761 Print Guide RSS Updates

Home Print Page
  Search: 
 
 

5 Things Every Teacher Should Be Doing

When reading the Common Core State Standards, it’s easy to get caught up in the details of each standard. (“Okay, I need to teach compound-complex sentences.”) However, it’s also important to take a step back and reflect on the big picture. How will the standards change your teaching approaches? How do the standards alter the definition of what it means to be an effective teacher in the 21st century?

The Common Core State Standards highlight five shifts that should be happening in every classroom. Teachers should:

• Lead High-Level, Text-Based Discussions

• Focus on Process, Not Just Content

• Create Assignments for Real Audiences and with Real Purpose

• Teach Argument, Not Persuasion

• Increase Text Complexit

Follow this link to the full PDF

 

Common Core - What's Up?

1. Why do we need Common Core State Standards? 

Advocates say we need common college- and career-readiness standards across the country that are internationally benchmarked so that when we give our students computer-scored writing tests, we can compare them to places like, say, Finland, that don’t have standardized tests. You can see why I’m still confused.

Frankly, I don’t think these standards are all that different from my state’s (California’s) current standards, which already emphasized “informational text” in upper elementary. Common Core standards are a little thinner, and they’ve “renamed” things a bit (“persuasive writing” is called “opinion”). 

Impressions of the standards will vary state-to-state, but these blog posts have helped clarify my thinking: 

2. Where’s the content?

Common Core English language arts (ELA) standards are advertised as ELA standards for science, technology, and social studies, but I don’t see the content—where’s the meat? My own guess is that Common Core standards ducked the controversies inherent in science and social studies standards (did slavery cause the Civil War? How about evolution? You get the picture). You still need content standards. Without them, even in elementary grades, your lessons will be weak at best and meaningless at worst.

I  strongly reccommend using a unit or big-picture planning tool like the Understanding by Design framework. Here’s an example of a unit plan I started (on the Revolutionary War) that combines ELA and social studies content standards.

3. What about next-generation assessments?

The new assessments reportedly will include more writing. This is a good step, but not without areas of concern, like “machine scoring” essays. Bud Hunt says it best on his blog. Writing for machines to score is not writing for an authentic audience, which is what students need to practice. In fact, it’s in the totally opposite direction. With machine-scoring, kids’ audiences will shrink from being read by at least one human being (their teacher) to zero.

That’s the fear I have about what is happening at the top of the education pyramid. I’m less worried about what’s happening at my school site, or even at the state level, in California. California is broke; uninterested in Race to the Top; and has a governor who hates standardized tests and, most important, the prospect of spending money on them.

Here’s a longer post I wrote on next-generation writing assessments and why I’d like us to resuscitate portfolio-based assessments. 

4. How will Common Core standards affect instructional delivery?

Are we returning to the reading and math wars? To an extent, standards can drive a lot of instruction. Look at how the shift in early reading instructional standards toward explicit phonemic instruction has led to more direct instruction. Lots of folks on the Common Core team are pushing various new (or not so new) models of reading instruction.

Similarly, in my district, content and instructional delivery programs are seen as one mushy whole—lumping together balanced literacy, Common Core standards, and genre study. I’m highly skeptical but heartened by a post by Grant Wiggins that acknowledges the sheer difficulty of doing some of the instructional models being advocated in the name of Common Core standards.

5. Who’s in charge here?

Teachers can be, but we have to step up to the plate with teacher-created curriculum. For anyone who has been in the business longer than I, this movement will sound familiar. For folks who have entered the profession after me (in the last 10 years), this will be a big change.

Most teachers in my district look at the standards and think, “No big deal, they look thinner than what we have now, so this will be easier.” But when I read the work of Common Core supporters (like the Fordham Institute), they are pretty clear that big instructional changes are coming, and teachers need to step up.

Although I don’t like the idea of Fordham or Common Core coauthor David Coleman telling me how to teach, there are a lot of parts of the new standards that are congruent with my teaching style. Teachers can steer Common Core in the right direction by taking the reins of curriculum development and advocating assessment practices (i.e., real people looking at student work) that are congruent with the actual ideals of the new standards.  

From ASCD

 

Common Core Glossary

Excerpt:

Evidence – Facts, figures, details, quotations, or other sources of data and information that provide support for claims or an analysis and that can be evaluated by others; should appear in a form and be derived from a source widely accepted as appropriate to a particular discipline, as in details or quotations from a text in the study of literature and experimental results in the study of science.

 

5 Questions

Q1 How can we staircase/scaffold reading assignments in order to get students to higher order thinking & comprehension? #engsschat

 

Q2 What  are some strategies to develop student writing & thesis statements to create clearer more reasoned written arguments? #engsschat

 

Q3 How can we incorporate collaborative/cooperative learning strategies to help build better speaking & listening skills? #engsschat

 

Q4 How can collaborative & cooperative groups work to build vocabulary while working on reading, writing & speaking skills? #engsschat

 

Q5 How can web 2.0 tools assist in developing the common core standards & skills previously discussed? #engsschat

Description

Loading  Loading...

Tip